Search for Indicators

Dane County Healthy Homes & Communities Dashboard

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Binge Drink County: Dane

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink County: Dane

22.4%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Dane has a value of 22.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.7%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 54 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value (23.4%), Dane has a value of 22.4% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(23.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the prior value, Dane (22.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.9%).
Prior Value
(21.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dane value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Adult Alcohol Use

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Adult Alcohol Use

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Adult Alcohol Use County: Dane

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Adult Alcohol Use County: Dane

21.8
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Dane has a value of 21.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.7.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 71 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value (24.8), Dane has a value of 21.8 which is lower and better.
WI Value
(24.8)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the prior value, Dane (21.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.5).
Prior Value
(22.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Value
Compared to:

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Dane

Current Value:

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Dane

26.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Dane has a value of 26.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 53 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dane has a value of 26.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (25.7), Dane has a value of 26.0 which is higher and worse.
WI Value
(25.7)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Dane has a value of 26.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Health / Children's Health

Health / Children's Health

Health / Children's Health

Children Reported as Lead Poisoned

Value
Compared to:

Health / Children's Health

Children Reported as Lead Poisoned

Value
Compared to:

Children Reported as Lead Poisoned County: Dane

Current Value:

Children Reported as Lead Poisoned County: Dane

0.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Dane (0.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (0.8%).
Prior Value
(0.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dane value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / County Health Rankings

Health / County Health Rankings

Health / County Health Rankings

Physical Environment Ranking

Value
Compared to:

Health / County Health Rankings

Physical Environment Ranking

Value
Compared to:

Physical Environment Ranking County: Dane

Current Value:

Physical Environment Ranking County: Dane

43
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Dane has a value of 43 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 54.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.

Health / County Health Rankings

Social and Economic Factors Ranking

Value
Compared to:

Health / County Health Rankings

Social and Economic Factors Ranking

Value
Compared to:

Social and Economic Factors Ranking County: Dane

Current Value:

Social and Economic Factors Ranking County: Dane

5
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Dane has a value of 5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 54.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

Dentist Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Oral Health

Dentist Rate

Value
Compared to:

Dentist Rate County: Dane

Current Value:

Dentist Rate County: Dane

75
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Dane has a value of 75 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 61 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 42.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dane has a value of 75 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (73), Dane has a value of 75 which is higher and better.
WI Value
(73)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the prior value, Dane (75) is greater and better than the previously measured value (73).
Prior Value
(73)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Adults who Smoke

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Adults who Smoke

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Smoke County: Dane

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke County: Dane

9.1%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Dane has a value of 9.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to the WI Value (15.1%), Dane has a value of 9.1% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(15.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the prior value, Dane (9.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.7%).
Prior Value
(9.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dane value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Health / Tobacco Use

Compliance for Nicotine and Tobacco Sales

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Compliance for Nicotine and Tobacco Sales

Value
Compared to:

Compliance for Nicotine and Tobacco Sales County: Dane

Current Value:

Compliance for Nicotine and Tobacco Sales County: Dane

86.0%
Percent compliant
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Dane (86.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (97.6%).
Prior Value
(97.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dane value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Food Insecurity

Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Food Insecurity Rate County: Dane

Current Value:

Food Insecurity Rate County: Dane

6.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Dane has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.8%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dane has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (7.2%), Dane has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Dane has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Dane (6.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dane value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Radon Test Results ≥4pCi/L

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Radon Test Results ≥4pCi/L

Value
Compared to:

Radon Test Results ≥4pCi/L County: Dane

Current Value:

Radon Test Results ≥4pCi/L County: Dane

44.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Dane (44.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (46.0%).
Prior Value
(46.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Dane value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Houses Built Prior to 1950

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Houses Built Prior to 1950

Value
Compared to:

Houses Built Prior to 1950 County: Dane

Current Value:

Houses Built Prior to 1950 County: Dane

14.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to WI Counties, Dane has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.4%.
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Dane has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the WI Value (23.9%), Dane has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
WI Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Dane has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Dane value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.